After the Supreme Court declined to hear the case Thaler v. Perlmutter, it appears settled that AI “cannot be the recognized author of a copyrighted work.”1 But to what extent can a human obtain copyright protection for a work they generated using AI? Allen v. Perlmutter, a case pending in the District of Colorado, may provide guidance.2
The plaintiff, Jason Allen, used an AI system called Midjourney to generate a work he titled “Théâtre D’opéra Spatial,” which won an award at the 2022 Colorado State Fair’s annual fine art competition.3 To generate the image, Allen claims to have prompted Midjourney “at least 624 times.”4 Allen then used Adobe Photoshop to “beautify and adjust the various cosmetic details/flaws/artifacts, etc.”5 Finally, he “upscal[ed] the image using Gigapixel AI” to arrive at the final product.6
Continue reading “Can AI Prompting Satisfy the Copyright Office’s Human Authorship Requirement?”